Qualimetry
Enterprise
An agent that cannot read your standards will not follow them. Qualimetry delivers your policies, principles and language standards into the agent's working context automatically, so the code comes back compliant the first time instead of coming back for another review round.
Standards reach the agent while it writes, not after it has finished. Compliant by construction, not by correction.
When the standard only appears at review time, every non-compliant change costs twice: a reviewer's attention on a rule that was written down years ago, and another agent cycle rewriting work that should never have been produced. Moving the standard upstream of the keystroke removes both costs.
One source of truth, the Standards Center, reaches the agent through four parallel channels: a read-only MCP server for live tool calls, agent skills that package the workflows, agent apps for Claude Code, Codex, VS Code and Cursor, and a hook that fires when a file is opened. All four land in the same place, the agent's working context, before any code is written.
Any agent that speaks the Model Context Protocol can call these. Every tool is read-only by design, so connecting an agent to Qualimetry can never change your standards, your findings or your configuration. Findings can be scoped to a single pull request, and a mono-repo can address one analysis at a time.
get_language_coding_standardsThe language standards for the language the agent is writing in.
get_general_principlesThe general coding principles that apply everywhere in the estate.
get_secure_principlesYour secure coding posture, as principles rather than a scanner ruleset.
get_policiesThe organisation-level decisions the code has to respect.
get_coding_standards_review_issuesOpen language-standard findings, optionally scoped to a pull request.
get_design_best_practice_review_issuesOpen design and best-practice findings.
get_general_principles_review_issuesOpen general-principle findings.
get_secure_principles_review_issuesOpen secure-principle findings.
get_policies_review_issuesOpen policy findings.
get_all_review_issuesEverything open across all five review perspectives.
get_standards_compliant_exampleA worked example of the compliant form, so the agent has a target rather than a complaint.
get_coding_standards_blitzyYour standards materialised as a rules pack for tools that read rules from disk.
get_rules_based_analysis_issues_summaryEnterpriseA summary of deterministic findings for the project.
get_rules_based_analysis_issuesEnterpriseThe deterministic findings themselves.
get_rules_based_analysis_rulesEnterpriseThe rules currently active for the project.
get_rules_based_analysis_rules_blitzyEnterpriseThose rules as a pack.
get_dependency_vulnerabilitiesEnterpriseKnown vulnerabilities in the components this project depends on.
get_dependency_upgrade_adviceEnterpriseThe next safe version, and how risky the upgrade looks.
Access is authenticated with a token issued from the Compliance Center, and the standards themselves are also exposed as MCP resources for clients that prefer to read rather than call.
Three shipped apps, each carrying the connection, the skills and the automatic hook. Setup is a single command or a single dialog.
A plugin with a compliance reviewer agent and slash commands for checking, fixing, pulling standards, triaging analysis findings and upgrading dependencies.
A plugin installed from the Codex marketplace, with the same setup command, the same skills and the same automatic file-open hook.
An extension that connects Copilot Chat or Cursor chat to your MCP server and installs the skills, with a guided setup command.
Skills package the workflows so that applying your standards is one step rather than a prompt somebody has to remember correctly.
Applies the standards, principles and policies for the file's language, silently, as the agent writes.
Pulls the open review issues for a file across all five perspectives, with a compliant example.
Materialises your standards as a rules pack for tools that read their rules from disk.
Triages deterministic findings by severity, security first, then reliability, then quality.
Assess, locate manifests, upgrade to the next safe version, then restore and build to validate.
This is the feature that changes the economics, and it is deliberately invisible. No prompt, no command, no discipline required from the engineer driving the agent.
Any file, in the course of whatever it was already doing. Nothing is invoked and nothing is configured per repository.
It needs nothing on the machine beyond git and a standard HTTP client, so it works the same on a laptop as in a container.
That file's open findings across every review perspective, grouped by pillar and severity, land in the agent's working context.
A standards-compliant example comes with them, so the agent has a target to write to rather than a complaint to react to.
The engineer sees none of this. They asked the agent to work on a file, and the change that comes back already respects standards nobody mentioned. That is the difference between governance people have to remember and governance that simply holds.
Engineers do not raise a ticket to get set up. The two buttons they need are on the page they already use to see their compliance.
None of this works as a separate product. Each stage exists because of the one before it and is only worth doing because of the one after it.
Book a demo and watch an agent pick up your standards, then produce a pull request that already complies.