Standards-based AI review

AI review of every pull request, against your standards

Qualimetry reviews each pull request against your policies, principles and language standards, explains what is wrong and shows the compliant fix, and can gate merges so non-compliant code never reaches your main branches.

How it works

Every PR, reviewed against your standards

Connect GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket and Azure DevOps, and Qualimetry reviews the new code on each pull request against the standards you own.

Connect your repositories

Link your GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket and Azure DevOps repositories, and Qualimetry watches for new pull requests across your estate.

Review on every pull request

Each pull request is reviewed as it opens, with findings scoped to the new code it introduces so the author sees only what changed.

Gate the merge

A merge check reports back to the pull request and can block it, so non-compliant code never enters your main branches.

What the AI checks

Five review perspectives

Every pull request is read against the standards you own, from five complementary angles.

Standards

Coding Standards

Checks the new code against your per-language coding standards, the concrete rules of the road for each technology.

Design

Design & Best Practices

Weighs the change against the design guidance and best practices your organisation has agreed on.

Principles

General Principles

Holds the change to the general engineering principles that shape good code across your teams.

Secure

Secure Principles

Reviews the change against your secure engineering principles, so security is judged on every pull request.

Policies

Policies

Confirms the change honours the organisation-level policies every team is held to.

code editor - Qualimetry review
AI code review findings
Review findings and a compliant-code example, in context.
Diagnose, then fix

It does not just flag problems, it shows the fix

For each finding, the AI diagnoses the underlying problem, explains the rationale, and generates a standards-compliant rewrite the author can adopt.

  • Diagnoses the underlying problem rather than pointing at a symptom.
  • Explains why it breaches a standard so the author understands the reason, not just the rule.
  • Offers a compliant example to copy that resolves the finding in your house style.
In your IDE and agents

MCP tools put your standards where code is written

An MCP server exposes your standards, review findings and compliant examples to VS Code, Cursor and JetBrains IDEs, and to AI coding agents, so guidance arrives before the pull request, not after.

  • Your standards, in the editor so developers can read the governing rule without leaving their work.
  • Review findings and compliant examples surfaced to the IDE and to AI coding agents as they write.
  • Guidance before the pull request so code is compliant by the time it is proposed.
code editor - MCP
Qualimetry MCP tools
Standards, review findings and compliant examples, available to your IDE and AI agents.
Questions

AI code review, answered

Which platforms does it work with?
Qualimetry reviews pull requests on GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket and Azure DevOps, so the review runs wherever your teams already raise changes.
Does it review against our own standards?
Yes. Review runs against the policies, principles and language standards your organisation owns, not a generic rule set, so findings reflect your house style.
Can it block merges?
Yes. A merge check reports back to the pull request and can prevent non-compliant code from entering your main branches.
Which IDEs and agents are supported?
Standards, review findings and compliant examples are available in VS Code, Cursor and JetBrains IDEs, and to AI coding agents via MCP.

Put an expert reviewer on every pull request

Book a demo to see AI review against your own standards, in your own workflow.

Book a Demo