Why Qualimetry

Built for the enterprise that has already gone agentic

An agent writes to a generic idea of good unless you give it yours. Qualimetry holds your architecture standards, coding principles and policies, puts them in the agent's context before it writes, reviews the result against the same standards, and gives you a compliance number you can act on.

Book a Demo See how the loop works

What sets it apart

Six reasons enterprises choose Qualimetry

Right first time, not rework

Your standards reach the agent while it writes, so the code comes back compliant instead of coming back for a third review round.

Your standards, not generic rules

Policies, general and secure principles and language standards you authored, governed and versioned in one place.

Five perspectives on every PR

Coding standards, design, general principles, secure principles and policies, each checked, with the compliant rewrite shown.

Compliance you can gate on

A score per file and per project, baselined so legacy debt does not swamp it, and a merge gate that enforces the threshold you set.

The agentic transition, measured

Which systems agents should take on next, and whether adoption is real, governed and producing better outcomes.

Fully managed

A per-customer isolated deployment operated for you, so there is no platform for your team to run.

The comparison that matters now

An agent with no standards is a liability at scale

The old argument was scanner against platform. The argument that decides budgets now is whether the code your agents produce is yours.

Agents without governance

The agent writes to a generic idea of good, not to your architecture.
Non-compliance is discovered in review, after the work is done.
Review volume grows faster than the team that has to absorb it.
Nobody can say how much of the estate is agent-written, or whether it complies.

Agents with Qualimetry

Your standards are in the agent's context before the first line is written.
Findings for the file the agent just opened arrive without being asked for.
Review confirms compliance rather than discovering the absence of it.
Adoption and compliance are both measured, from signals you control.

The golden thread

Prove that every rule serves a decision you made

Every finding traces back to a documented language standard, which upholds a principle, which implements a policy. Nothing is enforced that you did not decide.

The golden thread, from policy to compliance score

A six stage chain. A policy sets organisation intent, a principle upholds it, a language standard makes it concrete, that standard is carried into the agent's context as it writes, the pull request is reviewed against it, and the result becomes a compliance score.

Policy Organisation intent
Principle General and secure
Language standard Per-language, with examples
In the agent's context Delivered before code is written
Reviewed on the PR Against the same standard
Compliance score Measured, trended, gated

See how traceability works

From policy to compliant code so every finding maps back to intent you set.
Audit-grade governance that answers which standard a finding serves and why.
No drift between what you documented, what the agent was told, and what the reviewer checked.

Outcomes

Confidence, not just coverage

Right first time

not rework

Your standards

in every agent

Estate-wide

insight

Fully

managed

Questions

Why Qualimetry, answered

We already have a coding standards document. Why is this different?

A document is read once and then ignored, by people and by agents alike. Qualimetry turns the same content into something an agent queries as it writes, a reviewer checks against, and a score you can trend and gate merges on. The content is yours either way; the difference is whether anything acts on it.

How is this different from a code scanner?

A scanner checks code against generic rules after it exists. Qualimetry governs the standards you decided on, delivers them to whoever or whatever is writing the code, reviews against them, and reports compliance to the people accountable for it. Rules-based analysis is one input to that, not the product.

Is it just for engineers?

No. Engineers get standards, review and enablement. Leaders get Strategic Insights: a banded health score, a ranked risk map, priorities, and a view of which systems agents should take on next.

Is Qualimetry hosted, or do we run it?

We run it. Every customer gets a dedicated cloud subscription, network and database, provisioned, monitored and upgraded by us. Nothing is shared with another customer.

See the difference on your codebase

Book a demo and see your own standards reach an agent, then watch the pull request come back compliant.

Book a Demo